EVALUATION OF IMMISCIBLE CO2 INJECTION IN HIGH WATER PRODUCTION RESERVOIR IN THE PANONIAN BASIN

  • Ivan Al-Jeboore Reservoir engineer
  • Danica Milićević
  • Bojan Martinović
  • Milica Ješić
Keywords: CO2, Enhance Oil Recovery, Miscible fluids

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding is one of the most important and most used enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method because it does not only increase oil recovery efficiency but also is used as an underground CO2 storage. It is considered as a very complex method as it involves knowing the fluid phase behavior with different CO2 concentrations. It should be noted that oil swelling (volume increase) with the dissolution of carbon dioxide has a significant effect on increase of oil recovery. When this occurs, a significant decrease in the viscosity of the oil is observed. In this study, a reservoir 3D simulation modeling approach was applied to evaluate immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding in a high WC reservoir. To reduce simulation time, the PVT composition was grouped into 5 fluid components. The 3-parameter, Peng–Robinson Equation of State (EOS) was used to match PVT experimental data by using the Schlumberger’s ECLIPSE PVTi software. One-dimensional slim-tube model was defined using ECLIPSE 300 software to determine the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for injection of CO2. Beside this approach, an analytical MMP estimation was carried out using several correlations. Schlumberger Petrel software was used to set up a 3D simulation model of a static and dynamic model. Various scenarios of immiscible and CO2 injection have been simulated using ECLIPSE 300 software and these results have been compared.

References

ALSTON, R. B., KOKOLIS, G. P., & JAMES, C. F. (1985). CO2 minimum miscibility pressure: a correlation for impure CO2 streams and live oil systems. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25(02), 268-274.

CHANG, Y. B., COATS, B. K., & NOLEN, J. S. (1996, March). A compositional model for CO2 floods including CO2 solubility in water. In Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference. OnePetro.

CHEN, B. L., HUANG, H. D., & ZHANG, Y. (2013). An improved predicting model for minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of CO2 and crude oil. Journal of oil and gas technology, 35(2), 126-130.

CRONQUIST, C. (1978) Carbon dioxide dynamic displacement with light reservoir oils. In: Paper Presented at the U.S. Department of Energy Annual Symposium, Tulsa, 28–30 August 1978.

ECLIPSE (2014) Compositional Reservoir Simulation, Schlumberger.

EMERA, M. K., & SARMA, H. K. (2006). A reliable correlation to predict the change in minimum miscibility pressure when CO2 is diluted with other gases. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 9(04), 366-373.

GLASØ, Ø. (1985). Generalized minimum miscibility pressure correlation. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25(06), 927-934.

LAKE L. W. (1989) Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall.

LEE I. (1979) Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Displacement under Miscible and Immiscible Conditions.

ORR, F. M., & SILVA, M. K. (1987). Effect of oil composition on minimum miscibility pressure—Part 2: Correlation. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(04), 479-491.

DING-YU, P., & DONALD, B. R. (1976). A new two-constant equation of state. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 15(1), 59-64.

SHOKIR, E. M. E. M. (2007). CO2–oil minimum miscibility pressure model for impure and pure CO2 streams. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 58(1-2), 173-185.

SØREIDE, I., & WHITSON, C. H. (1992). Peng-Robinson predictions for hydrocarbons, CO2, N2, and H2 S with pure water and NaCI brine. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 77, 217-240.

YELLING W., METCALF, R.S. (1980) Determination and prediction of CO2 minimum miscibility pressures. Journal of Petroleum Technology 32(1), 160-168.

Published
2023-06-25
How to Cite
Al-Jeboore, I., Milićević, D., Martinović, B., & Ješić, M. (2023). EVALUATION OF IMMISCIBLE CO2 INJECTION IN HIGH WATER PRODUCTION RESERVOIR IN THE PANONIAN BASIN. Podzemni Radovi, (42), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5937/podrad2342001A