Application of MCDA in the determination of optimal block size for open-pit modelling and mine planning

  • Dejan R Stevanovic Faculty of Mining and Geology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-8344
  • Petar P Marković Faculty of Mining and Geology
  • Milica D Pešić Georgiadis Faculty of Mining and Geology
  • Mirjana V Banković Faculty of Mining and Geology
Keywords: block size, multi-criteria analysis, AHP, deposit modelling, mine planning

Abstract

The process of creating a geological block model as the basis for a further detailed design and planning of mining operations is a very responsible task. Errors made during this initial process are transferred to all other phases of the mining project. Certainly, one of the most important decisions for the modelling process is the choice of the appropriate size of the blocks that form the model itself. The determination of the optimal block size is not a simple process, because it depends on a large number of affecting factors and criteria. This process can be significantly facilitated by the application of multi-criteria analysis methods, which enable establishment of interdependence between the criteria in order to select the optimal solution. This paper presents the possibilities of applying the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) method for selecting the optimal block size for the needs of the coal deposit modelling process and mine planning, as well as the way in which this method can significantly facilitate problem solving, by looking at it from several aspects. The analysis included six criteria and four potential solutions, and the results themselves indicated the advantages and disadvantages of the applied method

References

ABDOLLAHI, S., JAFARPOUR A. and YOUSEFI, S. (2020) A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Determine an Optimal Block Size in Open-Pit Mine Modeling: a Case Study. Journal of Mining and Environment (JME), 11(2), 611-627.

COOMBES, J. (2004) Resource Estimation. Snowden Mining Industry Consultants.

CUPIĆ, M.; TUMMALA, R. and SUKNOVIĆ, М. (2001) Decision making: formal approach. Belgrade: Faculty of Organizational Sciences.

DAVID , M. (1971) Geostatistical Ore Reserve calculation, step by step Case Study. Decision Making in the Mineral Industry. CIM Bulletin, 12, 185-191.

DAVID , M. (1977) Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

DJENADIĆ, S. et al. (2019) Development of the Availability Concept by Using Fuzzy Theory with AHP Correction, a Case Study: Bulldozers in the Open-Pit Lignite Mine. Energies, 12(21), 4044.

HAYATI, M., RAJABZADEH, R. and DARABI, M. (2015) Determination of optimal block size in Angouran mine using VIKOR method. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 6(11), 3236-3244.

JANKOVIĆ, I. et al. (2019) Multi-Criteria Approach for Selecting Optimal Dozer Type in Open-Cast Coal Mining. Energies, 12(12), 2245.

JOURNEL, A. G. and HUIJBREGTS, C. J. (1978) Mining geostatistics. New York: Academic Press London.

LEE, A. H. I., CHEN, W. C. and CHANG, C. J. (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Application, 34, 96-107.

LEUANGTHONG O., NEUFELD C. and DEUTSCH C. V. (2003) Optimal Selection of Selective Mining Unit (SMU) Size. (pp. 1-16). Santiago, Chile: International Conference on Mining Innovation (MININ).

MAHDAVI I. et al. (2008) Designing a model of fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 206(2), 607-617.

RAHIMDEL, M. J. and BAGHERPOUR, R. (2018) Haulage system selection for open pit mines using fuzzy MCDM and the view on energy saving. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(6), 187-199.

SAATY T. L. and VARGA L. G. (2012) Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process ISBN 978-1-4614-3596-9/ISSN 0884-8289/e-ISBN 978--978-1-4614-3596-6. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

SAATY, R. (1987) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.

SAATY, T. (1980) The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York, NY, USA: Mc-Graw-Hill.

SAATY, T. (2003) Decision Making with the AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary? European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85-91.

SINCLAIR, A. and BLACKWELL G. (2002) Applied Mineral Inventory Estimation. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

SITORUS, F. CILLIERS, J.J. and BRITO-PARADA, P.R. (2019) Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 393-417.

STEVANOVIĆ, D. (2015) Optimization and planning of surface mines by stochactic models. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology.

STEVANOVIĆ, D. et al. (2020) Application constraines of optimization algorithms in the case of coal mines. Proceedings of the XIV International Conference OMS 2020 (pp. 76-87). Zlatibor: Yugoslavian Committee for Surface Exploitation: Belgrade, Serbia.

STEVANOVIĆ, D. et al. (2018) Application of MCDA in selection of different mining methods and solutions. Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal, 12(1), 171-180.

Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
Stevanovic, D., Marković, P., Pešić Georgiadis, M., & Banković, M. (2021). Application of MCDA in the determination of optimal block size for open-pit modelling and mine planning. Podzemni Radovi, (38), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.5937/podrad2138067M
Section
Articles